image

Table of Contents

  1. Message from the Superintendent/President 3

  2. Introduction 4

  3. Overview and College History 6

  4. Mission, Philosophy, Purpose, Principles of Community and Visional Educational Values and Goals 7

  5. Environmental Scan- External to the College 9

  6. Environmental Scan- Internal to the College 41

  7. Institutional Effectiveness 88

    1. Institutional Performance Expectations 88

    2. Institutional Performance 93

    3. Student Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILO) 108

    4. Interventions 111

      Grant Resources to Support Interventions 111

      Ongoing Resources to Support New Interventions 121

  8. Opportunities for the Future 122

    1. Future Labor Markets 122

    2. Planning for Potential New Programs 126

    3. Faculty and Staff Visions for Curriculum and Delivery of Support Services 127

    4. Opportunities for New Initiatives, Improvement or Expansion of Programs 145

      1. General Areas of Opportunity 145

      2. Possible Areas of Policy and Practice Modification 154

      3. Possible Areas of Curriculum Expansion/Modification 161

      4. New Career and Technical Education Possibilities 164

  9. Key Planning Assumptions, Goals, and Strategic Priorities 168

    1. Planning Assumptions 168

    2. Visionary Educational goals and Strategic Priorities of the College 171

    3. Strategic Priorities of the College 171

  10. Projections for Future Growth 172

    1. Future Capacity for the Growth 172

    2. Baseline Term Analysis 175

    3. WSCH Projections and the Future Program of Instruction 180

    4. Space Projections 181

  11. Acknowledgements 183

Appendix Materials 187

Appendix A- Neighboring Colleges and Distances 187

Appendix B- Industry Employment and Labor Force by Annual Average, 5-Yr Increments 188

Appendix C- Degrees and Certificates Related to Distance Education Substantive Change Proposal 191

Appendix D- Online Services and Forms Available to Students 193

Appendix Grant-Funded Intervention Summaries 203

Appendix Grant-Funded Interventions: Crosswalk of Major Intervention Effort Attributes 221

Appendix PM- Gavilan College Programs Matrix 223

Appendix SP- Gavilan College Strategic Priorities and Goals 224

Appendix T1- CSU Transfer Students from Gavilan, Major Field of Study 228

Appendix T2- UC Transfer Students from Gavilan, Major Field of Study 229

Appendix JOBS: Occupational Projections 230

Appendix X- WSCH Projection Details 2015-2030 246

Appendix Y- Space Projections Detail 2015-2030 252


  1. Message from the Superintendent/President

    A college on the move


    Gavilan College has been serving the higher education needs of San Benito County residents since 1919, and South County residents since 1964. We have grown to be a 2,700 square-mile district with five locations and comprehensive instructional programs in numerous disciplines.


    Throughout that history, we have periodically reflected on our practices and educational programs to ensure they remain relevant and continue to meet the academic and workforce needs of our community. With a new Superintendent / President on board, and a rapidly changing external environment, it is once again time to assess our operations and facilities in light of community goals. This Education Master Plan is a comprehensive review to determine how our curriculum, campus, and infrastructure will meet the current and future needs of our students. This document represents the findings of a thorough analysis of our strengths and opportunities for the future.


    Gavilan College faculty and staff have done tremendous work to open our new Coyote Valley and San Martin locations, develop 22 Associate Degrees for Transfer, and to provide innovative Student Services for student success.

    Our Career Technical Education division and Community Education department have worked together to bring on career training programs such as Water Resource Management, Unmanned

    Aircraft Systems, and Hospitality Management.


    This Educational Master Plan highlights some opportunities going forward – working with our community to build a “college-going mindset,” exploring a College Promise program, developing Guided Pathways, and assessing the potential to serve international students. In the areas of career training, there is potential to expand a business focus with customer service and business information worker training, and to support local manufacturers with advanced manufacturing and welding programs.


    The completion of the Education Master Plan is just the start, however. It serves as a blueprint and will inform the district’s Strategic Plan, the Facilities Master Plan, and all of the action plans that will lead to enhanced student success. With the strong leadership of our Board of Trustees and the on-going support of our diverse communities, the future of Gavilan is exciting and truly portrays a college that is on the move!


    Thank you for being a part of our journey.


    image

    Kathleen A. Rose, Ed.D. Superintendent/President

  2. Introduction

    During the academic year 2016-2017 the Cambridge West Partnership, LLC (CWP) was invited to assist the College in developing a new Educational Master Plan (EMP). The purpose of the EMP is to explore the ways in which the College’s curriculum options might be optimized to match labor market needs, increase transfer opportunities, and align with community educational needs/interests. A second purpose of the EMP is to provide a projection of future attendance that can be used in the Facilities Master Plan to determine the amount and type of space that will be needed to accommodate the future academic program of instruction and support services. The Facilities Master Plan will cast the projected space need into a sequenced building and facility program that addresses the primary elements of site development and facilities planning through the year 2030.


    Deliverables of the Plan

    This Plan will deliver the following:

  3. Overview and College History

    Gavilan College was originally established in 1919 as San Benito County Junior College. Instruction was offered at Hollister High School. It operated under this title until 1963, when a new community college district was drawn that included both San Benito and southern Santa Clara Counties. Three high school districts- San Benito, Gilroy Unified, and Morgan Hill Unified districts pushed to have the college district boundaries redefined.


    Successful passage of a local bond in 1966 provided the needed funds to construct the present, more centrally located campus at Santa Teresa Boulevard in Gilroy. College classes were offered in a temporary location at the Hollister Airport while the first facilities on the 170-acre parcel were being constructed. The Gilroy campus added buildings over time through state funding, with the final new building constructed in 2003.


    In 1997 and 1998, satellite sites were established in Hollister and Morgan Hill to augment the offerings at the main campus location in Gilroy. With the 2004 passage of the Measure E facilities bond, Gavilan College had funds to upgrade the existing campus and secure permanent locations in Coyote Valley and San Benito County. These land purchases were completed in 2008. Measure E Bond funds also were used to make improvements in institutional and classroom technology, expanded online services, and improvements in safety, accessibility, and lighting.


    The Gavilan Joint Community College District is comprised of 2,700 square miles encompassing southern Santa Clara County and the communities of Coyote, Morgan Hill, San Martin, and Gilroy. The District includes all of San Benito County and the communities of Hollister, San Juan Bautista, Tres Pinos/Pacines.

  4. Mission, Philosophy, Purpose, Principles of Community and Visional Educational Values and Goals

    Mission1

    Gavilan College cultivates learning and personal growth in students of all backgrounds and abilities through innovative practices in both traditional and emerging learning environments; transfer pathways, career and technical education, developmental education, and support services prepare students for success in a dynamic and multicultural world.


    Principles of Community

    As members of the Gavilan College community, we value the worth and dignity of every person, the pursuit of truth, devotion to excellence, acquisition of knowledge, and the nurture of democratic citizenship. We strive to maintain these ideals in an environment of inclusiveness and mutual respect.


    The Principles of Community provide the foundation which creates this environment. The expectation is that we maintain the highest ethical standards in order to establish an atmosphere of civility, honesty, cooperation, professionalism and fairness.


    Gavilan College aspires to be:

  5. Environmental Scan- External to the College

    The College in Context to its Environment

    The official Gavilan Community College District boundaries cover some 2,700 square miles of land located in the southern portion of Santa Clara County and all of San Benito County. The main campus of the College is in the City of Gilroy, along the US 101, approximately 86 miles from downtown San Francisco and 37 miles from downtown San Jose. The western border of the official Gavilan College District area is the Santa Cruz and Monterey County lines. The Merced and Fresno County lines in the east are the ends of the District area and Monterey and Fresno County lines define the southern border.

    The three principal cities of the official District service area where most population resides are Gilroy, Morgan Hill, and Hollister. Distances from the campus location to neighboring community colleges are found in Appendix A.


    Economy and Employment

    The California economy is expected to continue its expansion and growth. In 2014 and 2015 State revenue has been greater than projected. However, the actual revenues for 2016 are slightly behind projections. Nevertheless, for K-14 public education, the adverse economic circumstances of the Great Recession seem to have concluded.


    Although the State economy appears to be on the mend and unemployment levels continue to diminish, a recent report from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) observed that if recent trends in higher education and the economy were to continue, by 2030 the State is likely to face a shortage of workers who need some college education up to and including a bachelor’s degree. Their projections, and those of the Centers of Excellence, are that the shortfall of workers with a Bachelor’s degree may be as high as

      1. million to replace workers who will retire. 2 The expected growth of the state economy is projected to create 1 million new middle-skill jobs and 1.4 million replacement jobs for these occupations by 2025.3 Together, these needs are even larger than the projected one-million-worker shortage of college graduates with a bachelor’s degree. The analysis affirms that training beyond high school has become increasingly valuable in the labor market.


        The State of California and the Bay Area experienced the extremely severe recession starting in December 2007. In the years since the start of the Great Recession job growth in California has grown 5.4%, well ahead of the nation at 3.7%. Some parts of the state economy have not fully rebounded to the pre-recessionary levels, but the gross domestic product (GDP) is growing and the Silicon Valley regional economy is leading the state recovery with a job growth of 14.7% between 2007 and 2016.4 The unemployment rate



        image

        2 Johnson, Hans, et. al., “Addressing California’s Skills Gap,” Public Policy Institute of California, April 2016. “California’s Future-Higher Education.” February 2015.

        3 Centers of Excellence. Focus on 2025: A 10-year Middle-Skill Occupational Outlook for California.

        Retrieved 4/17/16 from http://doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu


        4 Allegretto, Sylvia. California’s Labor market: Eight Years Post-Great-Recession. Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics, University of California, Berkeley. May 2016

        has dropped substantially and wage rates are increasing, particularly in Santa Clara County. Unfortunately, the housing prices in the area are some of the highest in the nation and the Bay Area Peninsula is short some 60,000 additional housing units to keep pace with population growth. This housing shortfall and regional transportation challenges are severely limiting economic growth.5 In the November 8, 2016 election residents in Santa Clara County overwhelmingly approved Measure A to provide funding for low income housing assistance and other local housing initiatives and also approved Measure B to fund improvements for Caltrain, BART, selected roadways and the regional bicycle infrastructure.6


        The Bay Area economy is now rooted in a diverse, competitive set of industries. Technology is transforming industries such as finance, accommodations, and transportation. If the Bay Area were a country, it would be the 21st largest or equivalent to a mid-sized European nation. Twenty-eight of the global Fortune 500 and 29 of the US Fortune 500 companies are headquartered in the Bay Area and none have left the area since 2011. Beyond technology the Bay Area economy has a robust tourism sector.7


        The Central Coast Regional (San Benito to Ventura counties) economy is largely driven by tourism, food manufacturing, and agriculture. The region experienced economic downturn before the state slid into the Great Recession. Within the Monterey Bay area employment opportunities were significantly curtailed when the housing market crash began in 2007-08. 8


        San Benito County has not fared as well as the Silicon Valley with respect to rebounding from the Great Recession. The unemployment rate has been higher than the statewide and national averages. Although foreclosures were common between 2007 and 2012, they have since declined. The housing market appears to have rebounded, particularly around Hollister. The largest industry in the County is agriculture. It has contributed slow, but steady growth in employment opportunities. While tourism has been a major factor in the economy, the transportation demands on the infrastructure are projected to outstrip capacity. With housing costs at an all time high in the Bay Area, San Benito County has witnessed a sharp increase in urbanization with the largest number of farmland acres lost among the Bay Area counties (Santa Cruz, San Benito, and Monterey). During the Great Recession San Benito County experiences significant housing foreclosures. Since the high point of 2008, foreclosures have tapered off and the median price of homes has become within the grasp of middle-class families.9



        image

        5 Levy, Stephen. The Peninsula Economy. Institute for Regional Studies, Joint Venture Silicon Valley. November 2016.

        6 Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters. Election Results. Retrieved November 11, 2016 from http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CA/Santa_Clara/64404/183053/Web01/en/summary.html

        7 Bay Area Council Economic Institute. Promise and Perils of an Accelerated Economy: Bay Area Economic Profile, Ninth in a Series. May 2016.

        8 Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments. State of the Region. 2012

        9 Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, Regional Analysis and Planning Services. State of the Region. 2012

        Historic counts, 1990 to 2015, of industry employment and labor force by annual average for both Santa Clara and San Benito counties are found in Appendix B of this Plan.


        The future is looking a little brighter for San Benito and Santa Clara Counties. Between 2012 and 2022 the California Employment Development Department (EDD) projects an annual average 1.4% increase in jobs. The greatest growth is concentrated in three industrial sectors: (1) professional and business services (25%), particularly in computer system design and related services; (2) educational services (private), health care, and social assistance (25%), with the ambulatory health care services contributing almost 9,000 jobs; (2); (3) information (33%). The following charts document the projections in the two large regional areas and between the two counties for employment opportunities by industry category and illustrate the differences.


        Chart 1: San Francisco Bay vs. Coastal Region Projected Job Growth by Industry, 2012- 2022


        image


        Source: California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC

        Chart 2: San Benito-Santa Clara County Projected Job Growth by Industry, 2012-2022



        image

        Source: California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


        Translating the percentages of growth into actual numbers of jobs within each county illustrates the dramatic difference in the size of future employment opportunities in Santa Clara vs. San Benito counties. The greatest percentage annual projected growth among the eleven industry groups has been marked in bold.


        Table 1: Projections of Job Growth by Industry and County 2012-2022


        Santa Clara San Benito


        North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Category

        Employment Change 2012-

        2022

        Annual

        %

        Change

        Employment Change 2012-

        2022

        Annual

        %

        Change

        Business & Professional Services

        90,700

        5.1%

        230

        2.4%

        Construction

        -2,200

        -0.6%

        540

        7.5%

        Education & Health Services

        38,800

        2.9%

        380

        3.7%

        Farm

        410

        1.2%

        190

        1.2%

        Financial Activities

        3,200

        1.0%

        100

        3.3%

        Government

        3,300

        0.4%

        300

        1.1%

        Information

        43,300

        8.0%

        50

        5.0%

        Leisure & Hospitality

        16,300

        2.0%

        250

        2.1%

        Manufacturing

        21,100

        1.4%

        150

        0.6%

        Transportation & Utilities

        3,300

        2.6%

        220

        7.6%

        Wholesale & Retail Trade

        11,000

        0.9%

        530

        2.0%

        Total 229,210 2.6% 2,940 2.1%

        Source: California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


        The workforce, by industry, in the College effective service area (ESA) is described in the following two tables. The tables account for 967,335 adults in the workforce who are

        age 16 or older. Employment in the services industry dominates the economy in all of the census places within the area. The proportion of employment in manufacturing and retail trade industries are similar and represent the second and third important sectors.


        Table 2: Employment by NAICS, 2016



        North American Industry

        2016 Adults 16 Years or Older Employed in These Industries Effective

        Classification System (NAICS) Category

        Service Area

        Morgan

        Hill Gilroy Hollister

        San Martin

        w/o ESA Average

        Agriculture/Mining

        0.7%

        1.8%

        6.1%

        7.1%

        4.9%

        5.0%

        Construction

        5.0%

        7.2%

        9.0%

        8.7%

        12.8%

        9.4%

        Manufacturing

        18.7%

        15.8%

        11.6%

        11.2%

        18.9%

        14.4%

        Wholesale Trade

        2.2%

        3.3%

        3.1%

        4.7%

        2.1%

        3.3%

        Retail Trade

        9.2%

        9.9%

        12.4%

        12.1%

        8.5%

        10.7%

        Transportation/Utilities

        2.7%

        3.3%

        3.1%

        4.6%

        2.6%

        3.4%

        Information

        3.9%

        2.5%

        1.3%

        1.0%

        1.0%

        1.5%

        Finance/Insurance/Real Estate

        4.7%

        5.8%

        4.0%

        4.1%

        5.1%

        4.8%

        Services

        50.8%

        47.4%

        45.7%

        41.4%

        42.4%

        44.2%

        Public Administration

        2.2%

        3.0%

        3.5%

        5.0%

        1.7%

        3.3%

        count of adults 967,335 21,719 26,506 18,195 3,449 Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile, 2016; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


        Employment in white-collar occupations dominates the economy in the effective service area and in the three census places (Morgan Hill, Gilroy, and Hollister. Blue-collar occupations provide the second largest group of jobs in Hollister and Gilroy.

        Table 3: Adult Employment by Occupation, 2016


        Adults 16 Years or Older Employed in These Occupations, 2016 Effective


        Occupational Families

        Service Area

        Morgan

        Hill Gilroy Hollister

        San Martin

        w/o ESA Average

        While Collar






        58.4%


        17.8%

        23.9%

        Management/Business/Financial

        19.2%

        20.5%

        14.1%

        11.5%

        25.2%

        Professional

        31.7%

        23.4%

        17.1%

        13.4%

        17.6%

        Sales

        9.3%

        11.6%

        10.7%

        11.4%

        11.1%

        Administrative Support

        10.0%

        11.5%

        12.1%

        11.9%

        10.4%

        Services

        15.2%

        16.5%

        18.3%

        19.6%

        16.6%

        Blue Collar






        Farming/Forestry/Fishing

        0.4%

        1.0%

        4.7%

        5.4%

        2.3%

        Construction/Extraction

        3.9%

        5.1%

        7.5%

        8.7%

        6.7%

        Installation/Maintenance/Repair

        2.2%

        2.5%

        3.7%

        3.4%

        1.4%

        Production

        4.7%

        4.5%

        5.4%

        6.0%

        3.5%

        Transportation/Material Moving

        3.4%

        3.5%

        6.3%

        8.6%

        5.2%

        count of adults 967,335 21,719 26,506 18,195 3,499

        Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile, 2016; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


        The population in Gilroy, the largest city in the Gavilan College District service area, has grown faster than all cities in Santa Clara County. Job growth is expected to be modest over the next decade and will likely occur in retail, transportation, construction, hospitality, information, and health care industries. The proximity to Silicon Valley makes Gilroy an attractive location for businesses seeking lower-cost locations for expansion. Developing more affordable housing units in Gilroy will be a challenge for municipal authorities. Roughly 40 percent of the housing stock in Gilroy is rented and rent levels are more affordable than purchase prices.10



        image

        10 City of Gilroy. Gilroy Economic Development Strategic Plan. February 19, 2014

        One of the striking features of the economic dynamics in the region is the number of workers who commute into other counties for work, particularly from San Benito into other counties.


        Table 4: Top Five Commuting Destinations 2006-2010


        image

        Source: Bay Area Census, American Communities Survey Commute Flows Survey 2006-10; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


        The analysis of commuting habits of those who live in the three primary cities within the official district service area indicates a great deal of commuting has been taking place. In the case of Morgan Hill, two-thirds of the residents commute to other places for work.

        Half of the workers in Hollister commute elsewhere to work while 56% of those who live in Gilroy commute elsewhere for work.


        Table 5: City Level Commuter Flows 2006-2012




        Works in


        Total Working Population

        Total Commuting to Work Elsewhere


        % Working Elsewhere

        Gilroy

        Morgan Hill

        Hollister

        San Jose


        City of Residence


        Gilroy


        8,210


        1,690


        230


        4,425


        18,495


        10,285


        56%


        Morgan Hill


        945


        5,285


        90


        5,455


        15,953


        10,668


        67%


        Hollister


        1,275


        515


        5,960


        1,170


        11,903


        5,943


        50%

        Source: Bay Area Census, American Communities Survey Commute Flows Survey 2006-10; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


        Implications for the College

        1. In the broader regional San Francisco Bay Area the dominant growth industry is in information and communications technologies followed by hospitality and tourism. Conversely in the greater regional area of the Costal counties the dominant growth is in agriculture, retail, and construction materials and services

          industries. Employment opportunities are projected to continue into the future but they may not be in the cities located within the Gavilan official district service area. Although entry-level preparation for many jobs in some of these industries commonly does not require education beyond high school, there may openings for which the College needs to prepare individuals with career and technical certificates and Associate Degrees.

        2. Future job opportunities and economic growth in construction, trade, and education/health care/social assistance industries, plus a much improved real estate market with affordable housing characterize the future of San Benito County. Business and professional services and information industries, but a costly real estate market, characterize the future of Santa Clara County. The College can contribute to the economy of counties by preparing students for transfer to four-year institutions. For those students who want to “transfer to the workplace” upon completing a certificate or Associate Degree, the College can offer instruction that will equip them with in-demand job skills.

        3. The distinctive mix of advanced manufacturing, information and communications technologies, and research and development businesses places a premium on Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine (STEMM) fields of study. The College has well-established programs of study in these disciplines but will be called upon to increase the numbers of graduates.

        4. The municipal and county governments need to facilitate construction of affordable housing in order to stimulate the future population growth. If they are successful, that will bring a new audience for the College to woo.


    Higher Education Policy

    Several key policy decisions will influence the California Community College system in the coming years. These public policies both provide opportunities for the colleges but in some cases impose constraints.


    The Completion Agenda

    In July 2009, President Obama articulated that the American Graduation Initiative (AGI) has a goal of increasing the percentage of U.S. residents who earn high-quality degrees and credentials from the present rate of 39 percent to a rate of 60 percent by the year 2025. The goal is to make the U.S. competitive in the global marketplace. In the private sector, employers have been increasingly screening applicants for employment by requiring college degrees for positions that previously did not require a degree.11


    After President Obama has pushed to increase college graduation rates across the nation, Complete College America, a non-profit organization, was formed to advance this mission. It has enlisted support from leaders in 34 states to ensure greater numbers of students acquire degrees.



    image

    11 Doug Lederman. “Credential Creep Confirmed” Inside Higher Education. September 9, 2014; Karin Fischer. “A College Degree Sorts Job Applicants, but Employers Wish It Meant More,” Chronicle of Higher Education. March 8, 2013 p. 26-29

    The President’s challenge to the nation has not been ignored in California. The Community College League of California (CCLC) launched an “alternative futures” project, 2020 Vision for Student Success, to respond to the national graduation goal by identifying policy and practice changes that could be implemented to increase student achievement. To contribute its part toward achieving the national graduation goal, California needs to produce a total of 1,065,000 degrees or certificates per year to 2025. That translates to producing an additional 23,000 degrees and certificates per year, a 5.2% annual increase.12 The California Public Policy Institute has repeatedly informed state policy makers that the State faces a skills gap.13


    In August, 2014, the Board of Governors for the California community college system joined in the completion effort by announcing a goal to increase the numbers of students earning certificates, degrees, or transferring to four-year institutions by nearly a quarter of a million over the next ten years. For academic year 2013-14 the system awarded 190,314 certificates and degrees, a 40 percent increase from 2009-10 and an all-time high for the system. The Gates, Ford, Lumina, and Kellogg Foundations as well as the Carnegie Corporation of New York fund their collective work and the efforts of others to promote more college graduates. Collectively, there are more than two-dozen major entities that have sponsored initiatives to promote college completion.14


    Federal Policy and Funding Initiatives

    The Congress passed the Higher Education Opportunities Act in 2008. Subsequently, a series of new federal regulations have been issued to improve program integrity where Title IV financial aid funds are involved. Regional accrediting bodies are now expected to provide closer scrutiny of member institutions on a range of new topics. The Higher Education Act has been due for renewal and no one can predict its future direction.


    The Obama administration and the U.S. Department of Education have announced a new emphasis for their involvement with career and technical education through a transformation of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 as it comes due for renewal. Although the Act has not yet been renewed, the desired new directions will promote greater alignment between CTE programs and labor market needs as well as collaboration with K-12 and employers. Differences in the current provisions of the Perkins Act and the proposed changes were announced as long ago as April 2012.15


    In July 2014 the Congress enacted the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) by a wide bipartisan majority as the first legislative reform in the past 15 years of the public workforce system. This legislation took effect on July 1, 2015 with regulatory rules written by the Departments of Labor (DOL), Education (DOE), and


    image

    12 2020 Vision: A Report of the Commission on the Future, (Sacramento, CA: Community College League of California, 2010)

    13 Public Policy Institute of California. California’s Future: Higher Education. January 2016 and Higher Education in California. April 2016.

    14 Alene Russell. “A Guide to Major U.S. College Completion Initiatives,” American Association of State Colleges and Universities, October 2011.

    15 U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. Investing in America’s Future: A Blueprint for Transforming Career and Technical Education. April 2012.

    Health and Human Services (HHS). In general, the legislation eliminates 15 existing federal training programs and focuses on streamlining programs, reporting, and administration. WIOA keeps the basic structure of the prior legislation, with components covering occupational training, adult basic education, literacy and English language acquisition, vocational rehabilitation, and the national system of public employment offices and services. Key features and opportunities of the WIOA legislation include requirements for more unified planning between state and local authorities to address regional labor markets, a common set of performance measures, and promotion of best practices including contextualized adult basic education, ESL, and attainment of industry- recognized certificates.


    The White House convened a series of higher education summits in order to promote change in higher education policy and practice. Attention was given to greater access, particularly for low-income students, the completion agenda, college outcome performance measures, constraints to the ever-rising costs of high education, and other topics of interest to the federal government. To encourage more participation in postsecondary education the President used his 2015 state of the union address to offer a proposal, along the lines of the current policy in Tennessee, that the federal government help each state to make attendance at a community college free of tuition. By mid-spring 2016 there had been launched 27 new free community college programs.16


    While it has been announced that some new federal resources will be allocated for use by community colleges, the Congress is currently also struggling to restrain spending and to reduce debt levels. The long-term impact remains to be seen, but federal aid now has a lifetime limit and is also limited to a maximum number of credit hours represented by 150% of the credits required for the program of study the student is pursuing. For a community college associate degree 150% would equate to 90-semester credit hours.

    Veterans on the G.I. Education Bill may be more limited in the credit hours funded by that program. In the FY2016 budget the President proposed that the maximum award under the Pell Grant program would increase and new rules would require students to make progress in their programs by passing an increasing percentage of their total course load. In a December 2015 budget deal the Congress unexpectedly agreed to increase the Pell grant maximums and provide additional funds to college access programs for needy students (TRIO and GEAR UP). President Obama has signed an executive order to align the monthly repayment rate of federal loans to the level of future wages earned by the student. That may ease the burden of debt for students and make the act of borrowing for a college education more feasible for prospective students. The President has also declared a policy to not enforce deportation on children of illegal immigrants meeting certain conditions and to provide work permits for those children.


    Regional Accreditation Initiatives

    In part, stimulated by prior federal government actions, all regional accrediting bodies are insisting that greater attention be given to student learning outcomes.


    image

    16 White House Press Release. White House Launches $100 Million Competition to Expand Tuition-Free Community College Programs that Connect Americans to In-Demand Jobs. April 25, 2016.

    These new areas are in addition to the traditional goals of accreditation that are:

    1. Providing assurance to the public that the education provided by the institution meets acceptable levels of quality

    2. Promoting continuous institutional improvement

    3. Maintaining the high quality of higher education institutions in the region


      Implementation of the new ACCJC 2014 accreditation standards has introduced a number of changes, including the requirement to create a quality focus essay to guide future improvement efforts. 17 The changes also echoed some of the national discussions about educational quality and accreditation.


      California Community College Initiatives for Student Success

      The following State initiatives are intended to increase student success rates:

      • The Board of Governors’ basic skills initiative seeks to enable more students to overcome their academic deficiencies.

      • Targeted funds for student equity and student success and support programs.

      • Additional legislation, SB1440 Student Transfer Achievement Reform or STAR Act in 2010, simplified the process of transferring from a community college to a school in the California State University (CSU) system. This program provides a pathway for students to follow so that they can be admitted to a CSU with junior status. It has been complemented by SB440 in 2013, which further incentivizes transfer students to complete an associate degree.18


        The long-standing commitment to basic skills education has sometimes suffered for lack of adequate funding. However, in the 2016-17 budget there was a $30 million increase in this targeted allocation. In May 2016 the Chancellor’s Office announced a request for applications to be awarded up to $60 million from Proposition 98 funds to implement or expand evidence-based innovations and redesign in the areas of assessment, student services, and instruction in order to improve the progression rate of basic skills students into college level instruction. Known as the Basic Skills and Student Outcomes Transformation Program, the funds were awarded to 43 colleges.


        As second pool of funds was awarded to basic skills partnerships between community college districts or a consortium of districts and at least one California State University for the purpose of developing efficient and effective methods of coordinating remedial instruction and services. Successful applicants centered their proposals on evidence-based remedial education, instructional redesign, or program expansion. Five project proposals were awarded a total of $10 million.


        Perhaps the most potentially far-reaching set of recommendations for change in policy and practice were included in the report from the California Community College Chancellor’s Office Student Success Task Force. The group proposed eight areas of focus


        image

        17 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. Preparing for A Comprehensive Visit. Workshop materials presented on October 15, 2014.

        18 Campaign for College Opportunity. Keeping the Promise: Going the Distance on Transfer Reform.

        March 2016.

        with 22 recommendations. The Legislature passed the Student Success Act (SB 1456) in August 2012 and the governor signed it shortly thereafter. The measure did the following:


      • Commissioned the development of a uniform placement exam for students;

      • Directed colleges to provide students with orientation, assessment, placement and counseling services;

      • Required students to identify an educational goal (such as degree or certificate for transfer to a four-year university) and complete an educational plan;

      • Required colleges that receive student support service funds to complete and post a student success scorecard showing how well the campus is doing in improving completion rates, especially by race, ethnicity, gender, and income;

      • Established minimum academic progress standards for students to receive Board of Governors fee waivers, but also developed an appeal process.


    The Task Force recommendations came in the wake of a severe shortfall in resources for California’s public higher education institutions. Therefore, implementation of these ideas was delayed.


    Funds allocated for 2015-16 enabled the Chancellor’s Office to provide support to colleges that develop a student success and support plan (formerly matriculation) built around some of the recommendations arising from the Student Success Task Force. The provision of effective core services (orientation, assessment and placement, counseling, academic advising, and early intervention or follow-up for at-risk students) has been found to improve students’ ability promptly to define their educational and career goals, complete more of their courses, persist to the next term and achieve their educational objectives in a timely manner.19 As new priority enrollment rules were made effective in fall 2014, one of the incentives for students to complete the core services was the potential loss of priority enrollment or withholding of an enrollment opportunity.


    One Student Success Task Force recommendation was the development of a robust common assessment instrument. The assessment services will also include data collection and course placement guidance, but the placement cut scores will remain a local decision. Working groups of faculty from the disciplines of English, Math and ESL have been involved in drafting competencies that address the full range of prerequisite skills found in the curriculum. The common assessment initiative has a “go live” target of the 2016- 17 academic year, pending a successful pilot experience.


    The effort to exploit technology to support student success blossomed into the Educational Planning Initiative that was launched to help colleges meet the requirements for student success and support program funding by providing an individual comprehensive educational plan for all students. The initiative is also intended to enhance the counseling experience by inducing students to take more responsibility for their educational program plans and to have counseling expertise used only to verify the planning. A degree audit system to provide transcript, articulation and curriculum


    image

    19 Eva Schiorring and Rogeair Purnell. Literature Review Brief: What We Know About Student Support 2nd

    Ed. Research and Planning Group of the California Community Colleges. Fall 2012.

    inventory elements is to be provided to help both students and counselors. As a by- product, it is hoped that the numbers of unnecessary units accumulated by students will be reduced. A single sign-on portal is intended to be the student’s point of access to this system that is described as a service-oriented experience in which some existing services will be complemented by new services yet to be produced. The project has a “go live” target of the 2016-17 academic year, pending a successful pilot experience.


    The legislation implementing some of the recommendations of the Student Success Task Force, SB 1456, requires the coordination of student equity plans and student success and support programs. Student equity identifies groups of students needing more help and focuses on services and instruction for new and continuing students through to completion whereas student success and support programs focus on services for entering students and identifies individual students who need more help. Interest in student equity is not new as the Board of Governors adopted a student equity policy in 1992, but financial support for planning and interventions has not always been available or adequate. In 2014 the Legislature appropriated $70 million for student equity purposes, added foster youth, veterans, and low-income students as target populations, and required specific goals and activities to address disparities and coordination of them with other categorical programs. The traditional populations or variables researched for student equity planning are: age, disability status, gender and ethnicity. Unlike the student success and support program funding, dollars for student equity interventions do not require a match of funds or in-kind effort from the colleges. Funding for both efforts was increased for 2015-16 after the May 2015 budget revision. An additional increase is proposed for 2016-17.


    The governor’s interest in online education garnered an appropriation of $56.9 million over 55 months to launch the Online Education Initiative for the community colleges. The initiative is intended to increase access to more online courses created by community college faculty members and to provide students well-designed resources that will improve their chances of a successful learning experience. Part of the work in this initiative is to improve student readiness to engage in the learning experience through online instruction and to provide tutoring support for those students. Those two components have had a successful pilot project “go live” in spring 2015. A common course management system launched among the pilot colleges in fall 2015. Within the initiative are efforts to assist faculty in several professional development ways- creating of online course content, teaching strategies for the online environment, course design standards, and course review training.


    Adult Education Initiative

    The governor’s initial proposal for the adult education programs to be absorbed into the community colleges met with stiff opposition in the Legislature. A compromise was fashioned to improve and expand the provision of adult education through regional consortia that would eliminate redundancy and craft pathways into higher education for interested students. Instruction in parenting, home economics and classes for older adults were explicitly excluded from this funding. The 2015 AB104 legislation provided a block grant of funds (AEBG) to support action plans to close gaps for adult learners in four

    areas: (1) elementary and secondary basic skills; (2) ESL and citizenship for immigrant populations; (3) adults with disabilities; and (4) short-term career and technical education.


    Career and Technical Education Initiatives

    In 2012 the Legislature passed SB 1402 which the Governor signed to signal intent to recast and rewrite the economic and workforce education division programs and services. The new direction requires industry sector strategies that align collaboratively with labor markets on a regional basis. The Chancellor’s Office translated these policy directions into a four-part initiative called Doing What Matters (DWM) for Jobs and the Economy. Governor Brown has been generous in funding this work and his 2016-17 budget proposals offered $200 million more to expand access to career and technical education as well as to implement new regional accountability structures.


    The Silicon Valley schools within the Bay Area Community College Consortium (BACCC) selected the three priority sectors or clusters and two emerging sectors. The priority sectors were (1) Information, Communications, and Technologies; (2) Healthcare; and (3) Advanced Manufacturing. The emerging sectors were (1) Energy, Construction, and Utilities; and (2) Advanced Transportation and Renewables.


    The initial phase of DWM was designed to dovetail with the State Workforce Plan created by the California Workforce Investment Board. Some funding from the DWM initiative was awarded to the regions to enhance existing CTE programs and to support regional collaborative work. The second phase of this initiative applies common accountability metrics to gauge the extent to which the efforts have “moved the needle.” A system of common metrics was then developed that includes student momentum points and leading indicators of success. A third phase promotes bringing innovation and best practices to scale. The overriding message of the DWM initiative is to prompt collaborative action within regions to prepare students for work in critical industry sectors.


    The 2014-15 State budget provided a one-time pool of $50 million that helped the DWM initiative incentivize the colleges to develop, enhance, retool, and expand CTE offerings in response to regional labor market needs and to stimulate additional regional collaboration. The budget for 2016-17 offers $200 million to be allocated among the regions for the work of preparing students to enter the middle-skills workforce.


    In 2013 SB 1070 (California Partnership Academies) was enacted to establish an economic and workforce development program for the community colleges. It requires the Board of Governors, the Chancellor’s Office staff and the colleges to assist economic and workforce regional development centers and consortia to improve, among other things, career-technical education pathways between high schools and community colleges. Contracts and competitive grants funded by the program through 2015 were jointly administered to improve linkages and CTE pathways between high schools and community colleges.

    Additional efforts to promote career pathways from high schools to the community colleges were enshrined in the 2014-15 budget as it passed the California Career Pathways Trust Act. Some $250 million was provided in the form of one-time competitive grants. These funds were made available to school districts, county superintendents of schools, directly funded charter schools, regional occupational centers or programs operated by a joint powers authority, and community college districts. The Legislature allocated a second round of funding for the Trust with applications for competitive grants to be implemented in academic years 2015-16 and 2016-17.


    The most recent legislation to promote collaboration, AB 288, signed into law on October 8, 2015, authorizes the governance board of a community college district to enter into a College and Career Access Pathways (CCAP) partnership with the governing board of a school district to offer or expand dual enrollment opportunities for students who may not already be college bound or are from underrepresented groups in higher education. The goal is to develop a seamless pathway from high school to community college for career- technical education or preparation for transfer, improving high school graduation rates, or helping high school students achieve college and career readiness.


    In November 2015 the Board of Governors culminated a yearlong effort to revisit the ways in which career and technical education was delivered as a means to prepare students for middle skills jobs. The Task Force they commissioned provided 25 recommendations in seven broad areas. Full details are available at http://bit.ly/1lpCGOM. The recommendations are expected to shape policies from the Board of Governors over the next few years.


    Dual Enrollment

    The most recent legislation to promote collaboration, AB 288, signed into law on October 8, 2015 to take effect in January 2016, authorizes the governing board of a community college district to enter into a College and Career Access Pathways (CCAP) partnership with the governing board of a school district. The partnerships are to offer or expand dual enrollment opportunities for students who may not already be college bound or are from groups underrepresented in higher education. The goal is to develop a seamless pathway from high school to community college for career-technical education or preparation for transfer, improving high school graduation rates, or helping high school students achieve college and career readiness. The following are the highlights of the legislation:


    Many of the initiatives discussed above have benefited from generous funding associated with the continued recovery of the California economy. Apportionment base funding has been restored, categorical funding has been advanced, and one-time funds have been provided. That funding trend continued into the May 2016 revision of the Governor’s 2016-17 Budget. However, it is believed that the California economy is nearing the point when a normal economic expansion period should end and resources provided should be used to position each college for the future.20


    New Growth Funding Formula

    Apart from targeted funds described above, the SB 860 legislation from 2014 will impact the allocation of apportionment funds for growth to the districts by using a new formula starting in 2015-16. The legislation directed that growth would be based on each community’s need for access to their community college as determined by local demographics. Need within each district’s official boundaries is to be determined by three primary factors: number of adults within each district who are without a college degree, and the number of individuals who are disadvantaged as evidenced by unemployment and measures of poverty; Pell grant award annual percentage.21 Gavilan College is projected to have a constrained apportionment growth rate of 0.51%.22


    Implications for the Colleges:

    1. A broad array of governmental and private organizations is promoting the urgency for postsecondary institutions to produce more graduates. It has been estimated that the State economy will be short in excess of two million graduates with a bachelor’s degree or postsecondary education short of the bachelor’s degree by 2025. As a public agency the College should embrace that public agenda with vigor.

    2. As the federal government seeks to achieve a more balanced budget there is still financial support for students and incentives for institutions to increase student success and prepare more students to compete in a global economy. However, these incentives come with performance expectations. The College may have opportunities to enhance resources and it should act upon those opportunities.

    3. After many years of debate, several federal workforce-training programs have been consolidated and a new direction emphasizing regional efforts and agency collaboration has emerged in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) legislation. As of fall 2016 the Carl Perkins legislation has not yet been reauthorized nor has the Higher Education Act been reauthorized. The College should monitor trends in federal to be in a position to take advantage of any new direction.


      image

      20 Mario Rodriguez, Acting Vice Chancellor for Finance. 2016-17 May Revise Letter to the System.

      21 Day Toy, Vice Chancellor for Finance. “Growth Funding Allocation Formula,” Consultation Digest. November 20, 2014. “California Community Colleges Growth Funding Allocation Model” power point presentation to the Association of Chief Business Officers Conference. October 27, 2014.

      22 Fred Harris, Vice President for Administrative Services. Gavilan College Budget Workshop 2016-17.

      Slide presentation created August 29, 2016

    4. The regional accrediting commission, ACCJC, is following federal direction with requirements it has imposed on member institutions. Recent state legislation intended to induce intentionality into institutional planning and to hold public colleges accountable for performance on state priorities are in a similar spirit to the accreditation expectations. Attention should be given to tracking student achievement and learning performance and acting upon areas were performance does not meet ACCJC expectations.

    5. Starting three years ago State legislation (SB 1440) created a remarkable framework to facilitate transfer to a campus within the California State University (CSU). Community college and CSU faculty throughout the state have risen to the occasion to forge transfer model curriculums (TMCs). Gavilan College achieved its expected target, but there may be more that could be done to facilitate transfer.

    6. Particular state attention has been given to re-crafting matriculation and other student services along the lines of recommendations from the Student Success Task Force. Although matching funds are required, attention must be given to student success concerns. Participating institutions will be required to use a common placement assessment instrument when it is developed if funds are accepted. The College has a series of opportunities to improve services and student success by participating in these new state programs.

    7. A serious revisiting of online instruction as a delivery mode is being funded in the State. While the College has been building an array of online classes, the online education initiative is a promising opportunity in which the College should consider participating.

    8. Adult education has long been neglected as a public service in the state. The AEBG legislation provides fresh funding to promote regional cooperation and elimination of redundancy with incentives to focus the instruction on preparing vulnerable citizens for more effective participation in the workforce. This legislation, combined with the increased funding level for selective noncredit curriculum to equal the level of credit instruction starting in FY 2015-16, presents a unique opportunity to make a very substantial difference in the service area. The College should grasp the opportunity to implement the planning work done by the regional consortium.

    9. Several opportunities are unfolding for career and technical education both within and outside of the Doing What Matters for Jobs and the Economy initiative from the Chancellor’s Office. Several dedicated funding sources are promoting inter-segmental cooperation and regional approaches to this type of instruction. The College should position itself to fully engage the various opportunities in this curriculum.


    image

    First Day of Fall Term

    Population Served: GCCD Effective Service Area

    Within San Benito and Santa Clara Counties, the official boundaries of the District are the areas described in this graphic.


    Chart 3: Official Gavilan Community College District Boundaries


    image

    Source: Gavilan College Office of Institutional Research. Factbook, 2012


    In 2010 the area population numbered approximately 178,400 people. By 2018 the official District service area population is projected to 189,0709. Although the official District service area includes 12 zip codes, the College has been attracting student enrollments from a wider area.


    Effective Service Area

    Based upon an analysis of residential zip codes reported by enrolled students over the last five fall terms (2011 to 2015), the effective service area for Gavilan College encompasses 11 cities. Seventy-five percent of the student headcount comes from zip codes that are inside the official District area.

    Table 6: In-District vs. Outside-District Origination


    Category

    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2015

    Average

    % In-District

    68.1%

    71.4%

    78.8%

    81.5%

    76.1%

    75.2%

    % Out-of District

    31.9%

    28.6%

    21.2%

    18.5%

    23.9%

    24.8%

    Source: California Community College Chancellor’s Office, MIS Referential Files; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Individuals from the 21 zip codes represented in these areas account for 80% of the students participating at the College in the fall terms from 2011 to 2015.


    image

    image

    Table 7: Key Zip Codes for Student Origination





    Distinct Headcounts, Fall Terms


    image



    In- Dist


    Zip


    City


    2011


    2012


    image

    2013


    2014


    2015

    2011 to

    2015 %

    Change


    Total


    Average

    % of Total

    Cumula- tive %

    Y

    95020

    Gilroy

    2,374

    2,172

    2,167

    2,167

    2,242

    -5.6%

    11,122

    2,224

    29.9%

    29.9%

    Y

    95023

    Hollister

    2,068

    1,841

    1,772

    1,729

    1,797

    -13.1%

    9,207

    1,841

    24.7%

    54.6%

    Y

    95037

    Morgan Hill

    1,050

    940

    885

    904

    944

    -10.1%

    4,723

    945

    12.7%

    67.3%

    Y

    95046

    San Martin

    198

    193

    180

    166

    183

    -7.6%

    920

    184

    2.5%

    69.8%

    Y

    95045

    San Juan Bautista

    110

    112

    109

    101

    111

    0.9%

    543

    109

    1.5%

    71.2%

    Y

    95021

    Gilroy

    102

    114

    100

    90

    98

    -3.9%

    504

    101

    1.4%

    72.6%

    Y

    95024

    Hollister

    70

    73

    95

    71

    69

    -1.4%

    378

    76

    1.0%

    73.6%


    95076

    Watsonville

    58

    51

    51

    55

    66

    13.8%

    281

    56

    0.8%

    74.3%


    93906

    Salinas

    61

    35

    40

    41

    60

    -1.6%

    237

    47

    0.6%

    75.0%


    93635

    Los Banos

    40

    31

    41

    53

    64

    60.0%

    229

    46

    0.6%

    75.6%


    95123

    San Jose

    50

    34

    44

    42

    49

    -2.0%

    219

    44

    0.6%

    76.2%


    93907

    Salinas

    27

    39

    32

    40

    60

    122.2%

    198

    40

    0.5%

    76.7%


    95110

    San Jose

    31

    70

    13

    35

    38

    22.6%

    187

    37

    0.5%

    77.2%

    Y

    95038

    Morgan Hill

    49

    31

    27

    39

    35

    -28.6%

    181

    36

    0.5%

    77.7%


    95004

    Aromas

    35

    31

    27

    30

    34

    -2.9%

    157

    31

    0.4%

    78.1%


    95111

    San Jose

    21

    15

    29

    30

    52

    147.6%

    147

    29

    0.4%

    78.5%


    95127

    San Jose

    25

    15

    23

    32

    38

    52.0%

    133

    27

    0.4%

    78.9%

    Y

    95139

    San Jose

    24

    26

    20

    16

    23

    -4.2%

    109

    22

    0.3%

    79.2%


    95008

    Campbell

    24

    18

    33

    13

    18

    -25.0%

    106

    21

    0.3%

    79.5%


    95122

    San Jose

    16

    11

    23

    20

    35

    118.8%

    105

    21

    0.3%

    79.7%


    95112

    San Jose

    13

    13

    20

    28

    29

    123.1%

    103

    21

    0.3%

    80.0%

    Source: California Community College Chancellor’s Office, MIS Referential Files; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC

    These zip codes represent a limited number of cities as shown on the following table. Table 8: Key Cities for Student Origination


    In-

    Distinct Headcounts, Fall Terms

    2011 to

    2015 %


    % of All


    Cumula-

    Dist City 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

    Change Total Average

    Zips Total

    tive %


    Y

    Gilroy

    2,476

    2,286

    2,267

    2,257

    2,340

    -5.5%

    11,626

    2,325

    31.2%

    31.2%

    Y

    Hollister

    2,138

    1,914

    1,867

    1,800

    1,866

    -12.7%

    9,585

    1,917

    25.7%

    57.0%

    Y

    Morgan Hill

    1,099

    971

    912

    943

    979

    -10.9%

    4,904

    981

    13.2%

    70.1%

    Y

    San Martin

    198

    193

    180

    166

    183

    -7.6%

    920

    184

    2.5%

    72.6%

    Y

    San Juan Bautista

    110

    112

    109

    101

    111

    0.9%

    543

    109

    1.5%

    74.1%


    San Jose

    156

    158

    152

    187

    241

    54.5%

    894

    179

    2.4%

    76.5%


    Salinas

    88

    74

    72

    81

    120

    36.4%

    435

    87

    1.2%

    77.6%


    Watsonville

    58

    51

    51

    55

    66

    13.8%

    281

    56

    0.8%

    78.4%


    Los Banos

    40

    31

    41

    53

    64

    60.0%

    229

    46

    0.6%

    79.0%


    Aromas

    35

    31

    27

    30

    34

    -2.9%

    157

    31

    0.4%

    79.4%

    Y

    San Jose

    24

    26

    20

    16

    23

    -4.2%

    109

    22

    0.3%

    79.7%


    Campbell

    24

    18

    33

    13

    18

    -25.0%

    106

    21

    0.3%

    80.0%

    Source: California Community College Chancellor’s Office, MIS Referential Files; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Demographic attributes for the effective service area associated with the College are provided in the following table. Population growth between the year 2010 and 2021 for the effective service area is estimated to be 12.6%. The projected annual rate of population growth in the next several years (2016 to 2021) is 1.20%. The median age, in the low to mid-30s, will be relatively young. Household income and home values continue to increase.

    Table 9: Effective Service Area Demographics


    Gavilan Effective Service Area





    2016 to 2021








    Annual Rate

    2000 to 2016

    2010 to 2021

    Element

    2000

    2010

    2016

    2021

    of Change

    % Change

    % Change

    Population

    689,709

    731,662

    776,179

    823,866

    1.20%

    12.5%

    12.6%

    Group Quarters



    13,532





    Households

    200,497

    217,802

    228,404

    242,006

    1.16%

    13.9%

    11.1%

    Average Household Size

    3.39

    3.30

    3.34

    3.35


    -1.5%

    1.5%

    Median Age


    33.0

    33.7

    34.9




    Median Home Value



    $521,075

    $570,400




    Median Household Income



    $68,630

    $78,400




    Per Capita Income



    $27,547

    $29,991




    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Demographic and Income Profile and Market Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC

    An extended population projection for the effective service area is illustrated in the following table.


    Table 10: Effective Service Area, Extended Population Projections


    Extended Population Projection Annual Rate

    Area

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026 of

    Change

    Gavilan Effective Service Area

    833,752

    843,757

    853,883

    864,129

    874,499

    1.20%

    image

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profiles; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    This larger effective service area is illustrated in the following graphic. Chart 4: Gavilan College Effective Service Area

    Fred's HD:Users:fredericktrapp:Desktop:Screen Shot 2016-11-01 at 8.41.46 PM.png

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profiles; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC

    The three primary individual locations within the District official service area have different rates of growth with Gilroy growing most rapidly, but Morgan Hill is close behind. In fall 2016 residents in both Gilroy and Morgan Hill approved ballot measures designed to limit or slow down growth and to promote a strategy of “in fill” as opposed to sprawl at the edges of each city.


    Table 11: Census Place Populations in the District Official Service Area



    Population Counts & Projection

    2016 to 2021

    Annual Rate

    Area/Census Place 2000 2010 2016 2021 of Change

    Effective Service Area

    689,709

    731,662

    776,179

    823,866

    1.20%

    Morgan Hill

    33,733

    37,882

    43,296

    47,854

    2.02%

    Gilroy

    42,560

    48,821

    54,338

    60,959

    2.33%

    Hollister

    33,954

    34,928

    37,627

    40,059

    1.26%

    San Martin

    6,504

    7,027

    7,372

    7,775

    1.07%

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profiles; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    An extended population projection for the three primary places within the District’s

    official service area is illustrated on the following table.


    Table 12: District Official Service Area Census Places, Extended Population Projections


    Extended Population Projection Annual Rate

    Area 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 of Change

    Gavilan Effective Service Area

    833,752

    843,757

    853,883

    864,129

    874,499

    1.20%

    Morgan Hill

    48,821

    49,807

    50,813

    51,839

    52,887

    2.02%

    Gilroy

    62,379

    63,833

    65,320

    66,842

    68,399

    2.33%

    Hollister

    40,564

    41,075

    45,289

    45,860

    46,438

    1.26%

    San Martin

    7,858

    7,942

    8,742

    8,836

    8,930

    1.07%

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profiles; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    The 2006 landmark legislation, AB32, set absolute statewide limits on greenhouse gas emissions and called for local governments to set reduction targets. The 2008 sustainable communities and climate protection act, SB 375, supports the state climate action goals through requirements for coordinated transportation and land use planning to reduce travel demand. In response to these legislative directives the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission developed the Plan Bay Area 2040 Preferred Scenario, an update to the work started in 2010, and the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) developed in June 2011 the Envisioning the Monterey Bay Area: A Blueprint for Sustainable Growth and Smart Infrastructure Among other things these plans seek to stimulate new residential housing construction to use existing vacant land within existing jurisdictions.

    In fall 2016 residents in Morgan Hill and Gilroy restated their interest in managing the rate of housing construction and population increase in those communities by passing measures S and H respectively. In contrast, the City of Hollister had a six-year, state- mandated growth moratorium imposed in 2002 due to shortcomings in the municipal wastewater capacity. Subsequently, the Great Recession from 2008 to 2012 discouraged any residential construction. But, as of 2016 there is a building boom in Hollister as the City has 31 building projects, totaling 2,480 units scattered throughout the City. In addition, the Santana Ranch project for 1,100 homes to be constructed on land just outside the city limits had been previously approved by the County of San Benito. Some 1,200 housing units had been approved for construction in the 1990s but had not been built. The City cannot predict when or to what extent developers will actually construct the homes they have been permitted to complete. 23


    Relatively speaking, the cost of housing in the South San Francisco Bay region is high and projected to continue rising with the largest increases predicted for San Benito County.


    Table 13: Median Home Values


    Median Home Values 2016 vs. 2021

    Element 2000 2010 2016 2021 % Change

    Effective Service Area



    $521,075

    $570,662

    9.5%

    Santa Clara County

    $518,241

    $596,708

    $711,608

    $737,942

    3.7%

    Morgan Hill



    $682,519

    $740,011

    8.4%

    Gilroy



    $546,188

    $599,542

    9.8%

    San Martin



    $837,743

    $874,049

    4.3%

    San Benito County

    $342,477

    $288,083

    $468,368

    $521,391

    11.3%

    Hollister



    $374,543

    $432,411

    15.5%

    San Juan Bautista



    $587,500

    $689,560

    17.4%

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profiles. 2016. California Association of Realtors. 1990-2017 Historic Median Prices of Homes; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Except for Hollister, the majority of owner-occupied homes in all of the other cities within the College service area are valued in 2016 at $400,000 or more.


    image

    23 Cheek, Marty. “Morgan Hill, Gilroy Voters Will Decide Future Growth in Region,” Morgan Hill Life. October 26 and November 8, 2016. Chadwell, John. “City Manager Says New Homes Have Been Planned for Decades,” Benito Link. October 9, 2016. Paxton, Mary. Personal Correspondence. City of Hollister Development Services, November 21, 2016 and Michael Kelly, Personal Correspondence. San Benito County Planning, November 21, 2016

    Table 14: 2016 Owner Occupied Housing Unit Values



    Value Range


    Eff Service Area

    2016 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Morgan

    Hill San Martin Gilroy Hollister


    San Juan Bautista

    <$50,000

    3.7%

    2.6%

    2.3%

    3.2%

    4.8%

    0.9%

    $50-$149,999

    4.8%

    2.3%

    1.2%

    1.3%

    3.7%

    2.9%

    $150-$249,999

    7.1%

    1.6%

    1.0%

    3.4%

    14.8%

    3.3%

    $250-$399,999

    17.8%

    7.8%

    2.7%

    17.1%

    31.6%

    23.3%

    $400-$749,999

    45.5%

    43.9%

    30.8%

    53.5%

    38.2%

    35.0%

    $750-$1M+

    21.1%

    41.7%

    62.0%

    21.6%

    6.9%

    34.7%

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profiles; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Within the effective service area 46% of the residents have either less than a high school diploma or only a high school diploma. Another 21% completed some college but did not complete an Associate Degree. Both of these groups of residents are prime candidates for the instruction offered by the College.


    image

    Chart 5: Effective Service Area, Educational Attainment in 2016 for Adults Age 25 or Older


    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC

    The census place locations within the District official service area have different adult educational attainment distributions with the Hollister and Gilroy having the largest portion of adults with less than high school completion attainment.


    Table 15: Census Places Adult Educational Attainment, 2016


    image


    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    In response to the AB86 Adult Education legislation, educational need indicator data was assembled to facilitate adult education program planning in the regional consortia area.

    The socio-economic data they received to support planning is displayed in the following table representing the educational needs of the most vulnerable citizens in the larger region.


    Table16: Educational Needs of Adults in the Gavilan Regional Consortium for Academic and Career Education Services




    AB86 Educational Needs of Adults



    ESRI 2014 Data

    5-Yr ACS 2009-2013 Data


    Regional Consortia

    2014 Regional

    Population 18 years +


    Poverty

    No High

    School Diploma


    HS Grad

    Some College

    Unemploy- ment


    Illiteracy

    ESL (English

    Language Learners)

    Gavilan's Regional Consortium

    132,143

    7,976

    22,393

    30,240

    27,666

    7,053

    13,511

    15,284

    Percent of 2014 Population


    6.04%

    16.95%

    22.88%

    20.94%

    5.34%

    10.22%

    11.57%

    Sources: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey and U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics- National Assessment on Adult Literacy; analysis by the AB86 Work Group

    Compared to San Benito County, the Gavilan College effective service area (ESA) contains slightly more low-income households. Compared to Santa Clara County, the Gavilan ESA contains six percent more low-income households.


    Table 17: Comparative Household Incomes


    2016 Income Distributions

    Gavilan County

    Household Income Range ESA San Benito Santa Clara

    <=$34,999

    24.9%

    23.7%

    18.5%

    $35-74,999

    28.3%

    28.5%

    21.5%

    $75-149,999

    30.8%

    33.3%

    31.6%

    $150,000 +

    16.0%

    14.4%

    28.4%

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Demographic and Income Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    The census places that comprise the District official service area vary in the 2016 household income distributions as illustrated in the following table. Hollister as well as Gilroy have the highest portion (26% and 25% respectively) of households reporting an annual income of less than $35,000.


    Table 18: Comparative Household Incomes by City


    2016 Income Distributions

    Household Income Range Morgan Hill Gilroy Hollister San Martin

    <=$34,999

    18.0%

    25.4%

    26.3%

    13.0%

    $35-74,999

    19.9%

    25.9%

    30.9%

    25.0%

    $75-149,999

    31.2%

    28.7%

    31.9%

    33.0%

    $150,000 +

    30.9%

    19.9%

    10.9%

    29.0%

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Demographic and Income Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    The Insight Center for Community Economic Development has developed the California Family Economic Self-Sufficiency Standard to quantify the costs of basic needs for California’s working families. The Chancellor’s Office has embraced that standard in its program development work of career and technical education. The Insight Center’s analysis, and that of two other nationally recognized groups, places the annual wage required to sustain a family of four well above a year household income level of $35,000. The most recent calculation of the federal poverty level for a family of four is $24,300.

    Table 19: Living Self-Sustaining Household Income Comparisons


    Annual Wage

    Entity Santa Clara San Benito

    MIT Living Wage Calculator

    $63,669

    $56,472

    Insight Center for Community Economic Development

    $81,774

    $73,316

    Economic Policy Center Family Budget Calculator

    $84,461


    *MAGI- modified adjusted gross income

    Sources: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Living Wage Calculator. Retrieved on November 25, 2016 from http://livingwage.mit.edu. Insight Center for Community Economic Development. California Family Economic Self-Sufficiency Standard. . Retrieved on November 25, 2016 from http://www.insightcced.org/tools-metrics/self-sufficiency-standard-tool-for-california/. Economic Policy Institute. Family Budget Calculator. Retrieved on November 25, 2016 from http://www.epi.org/resources/budget/


    From the 2010 census to 2021 the age group in the College effective service area that will increase the most (3.4%) in proportion to the overall population is the retirement (65+ age group). The younger career choice group (15-24 age) is projected to decrease the most, 1.9%. Out to 2021, the combined career choice and career start groups are projected to decrease by 1.4%, but will continue to represent a substantial proportion of the overall population.


    Table 20: Effective Service Area Age Range Projections


    2016 to 2021

    Gavilan College Absolute

    Effective Service Area 2010 2016 2021 Change

    under 15

    22.6%

    22.1%

    21.1%

    -1.5%

    Career Choice (15-24)

    15.5%

    14.6%

    13.6%

    -1.9%

    Career Start (25-34)

    14.9%

    15.4%

    15.4%

    0.5%

    Career Middle (35-44)

    14.4%

    13.6%

    14.0%

    -0.4%

    Career Finish (45-64)

    23.6%

    23.8%

    23.5%

    -0.1%

    Retirement (65+)

    9.1%

    10.7%

    12.5%

    3.4%

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    The more detailed age table that follows projects that by 2021 high school age students will represent 4% of the population while college-age students will represent 10% of the population in the effective service area. However, over the next five years the proportion of residents in every age will decline slightly.

    Table 21: Effective Service Area Detailed Age Range Projections


    Effective Service Area Effective Service Area

    Age 2010 2016 2021 Average 2010 2016 2021 Average

    15

    10,914

    10,717

    11,131


    32,996

    16

    11,392

    10,669

    11,105

    17

    11,332

    10,667

    11,061

    High School Subtotal

    33,638

    32,053

    33,297

    1.5%

    1.4%

    1.4%


    4.3%

    1.6%

    1.4%

    1.3%

    1.5%

    1.4%

    1.3%

    4.6%

    4.2%

    4.0%


    18

    11,717

    11,248

    11,612

    19

    11,667

    11,533

    11,738

    20-24

    56,082

    58,226

    55,432

    College Age Subtotal

    79,466

    81,007

    78,782

    1.6%

    1.4%

    1.4%

    1.6%

    1.5%

    1.4%

    7.7%

    7.5%

    6.7%

    10.9%

    10.4%

    9.5%

    79,752

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC

    10.3%


    Hollister and Gilroy reported the largest concentration of individuals in the combined career choice (15-24 age) and career start (25-34) age categories. Morgan Hill reporting the smallest portion of the population in those age categories is not far behind the other two cities. The following table illustrates the distribution of these most likely college- going age groups among the census places within the District official service area is found on.


    Table 22: Census Places Age Range Projections



    Career Choice & Starter

    2016-2021

    Absolute

    Area/Census Place 2010 2016 2021 Change Average

    Effective Service Area

    30.4%

    30.0%

    29.0%

    -1.4%

    29.8%

    Morgan Hill

    24.2%

    25.2%

    25.1%

    0.9%

    24.8%

    Gilroy

    28.0%

    28.5%

    27.8%

    -0.2%

    28.1%

    Hollister

    29.7%

    30.3%

    29.7%

    0.0%

    29.9%

    San Martin

    26.3%

    24.7%

    23.2%

    -3.1%

    24.7%

    Career Choice- ages 15-24 Career Start- ages 25-34

    Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile; analysis by Cambridge West

    Partnership, LLC


    Across the State, participation rates in the community college system are traditionally highest among the younger adults, ages 18 to 24. In recent years 52% of the enrolled students at the College fall into the traditional college-age range of 18 to 24 years of age. The size of that group within the effective service area is critical to future enrollments.

    Over a fourteen-year period of time, 1996 to 2010, the College annually enrolled 50 or more students from three high schools that were the primary source of students and 20 to 49 students from three additional high schools. Currently, six comprehensive high schools and three continuation high schools are the primary feeder institutions to the College. The Dr. TJ Owens Early College Academy students are carefully screened for academic potential and as a group far more of those graduates have completed the UC/CSU preparatory courses. These public schools represent three different public school districts distinguished by colors in the following table.


    Table 23: College Preparation at Selected Feeder High Schools



    2010-1

    1 Academi

    c Year

    2011-12

    Academi

    c Year

    2012-13

    Academi

    c Year

    2013-14

    Academic

    Year

    2014-15

    Academic

    Year


    High School


    #

    Grads

    # Grads with UC/CSU

    Courses


    %


    #

    Grads

    # Grads with UC/CSU

    Courses


    %


    #

    Grads

    # Grads with UC/CSU

    Courses


    %


    # Grads

    # Grads with UC/CSU

    Courses


    %


    #

    Grads

    # Grads with UC/CSU

    Courses


    %

    Gilroy High

    464

    177

    38.1%

    313

    113

    36.1%

    246

    96

    39.0%

    299

    121

    40.5%

    235

    77

    32.8%

    Christopher High School

    1

    0

    0.0%

    245

    88

    35.9%

    328

    105

    32.0%

    334

    124

    37.1%

    412

    174

    42.2%

    Dr. TJ Owens Early College Academy

    49

    1

    2.0%

    58

    47

    81.0%

    38

    22

    57.9%

    53

    45

    84.9%

    41

    37

    90.2%

    Ann Sobrato High

    274

    1

    0.4%

    275

    139

    50.5%

    306

    177

    57.8%

    276

    155

    56.2%

    280

    169

    60.4%

    Live Oak High

    235

    66

    28.1%

    244

    103

    42.2%

    251

    120

    47.8%

    259

    163

    62.9%

    242

    127

    52.5%

    San Benito High

    617

    219

    35.5%

    592

    197

    33.3%

    622

    238

    38.3%

    611

    257

    42.1%

    648

    287

    44.3%

    Subtotal

    1,640

    464

    28.3%

    1,727

    687

    39.8%

    1,791

    758

    42.3%

    1,832

    865

    47.2%

    1,858

    871

    46.9%

















    Mt. Madonna High (Continuation)

    96

    1

    1.0%

    127

    2

    1.6%

    127

    1

    0.8%

    131

    1

    0.8%

    125

    0

    0.0%

    Central High (Continuation)

    44

    6

    13.6%

    59

    0

    0.0%

    54

    0

    0.0%

    51

    0

    0.0%

    39

    0

    0.0%

    San Andreas Continuation High

    69

    0

    0.0%

    75


    0.0%

    65

    0

    0.0%

    54

    0

    0.0%

    55

    0

    0.0%

    Subtotal

    209

    7

    3.3%

    261

    2

    0.8%

    246

    1

    0.4%

    236

    1

    0.4%

    219

    0

    0.0%

















    Total

    1,849

    471

    25.5%

    1,988

    689

    34.7%

    2,037

    759

    37.3%

    2,068

    866

    41.9%

    2,077

    871

    41.9%

    Source: Gavilan College. Factbook. 2012 and California Department of Education. Data Quest Graduates.

    Retrieved November 2, 2016 from http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/


    The long-term projection for high school graduates in San Benito County is a 7% increase between 2013-14 and 2024-25 or a 0.58% annual percentage increase. The corresponding long-term projection in Santa Clara County is only 4.1% between 2013-14 and 2024-25 or a modest 0.34% annual percentage change. At least both projections are in a positive direction.


    The largest racial group in the Gavilan effective service areas has been White, but the portion of the self-reported White group is expected to shrink 3.6% by 2021. Conversely, the portion of the self-reported Asian group is anticipated to increase 2.7%.


    Hispanic ethnic residents currently constitute 52.1% of the population. The Hispanic ethnic group is estimated to continue increasing by 1.8% between 2016 and 2021 to become 53.9% by 2021.

    Table 24: Effective Service Area, Racial and Ethnic Composition


    2016 to 2021

    Effective Service Area Absolute

    Race 2010 2016 2021 Change

    White

    50.5%

    48.4%

    46.9%

    -3.6%

    Black

    2.5%

    2.5%

    2.5%

    0.0%

    Asian*

    16.2%

    17.6%

    18.9%

    2.7%

    Some Other

    25.6%

    26.1%

    26.2%

    0.6%

    Two or More

    5.2%

    5.5%

    5.6%

    0.4%


    Effective Service Area Ethnicity

    Hispanic Origin

    52.1%

    53.0%

    53.9%

    1.8%

    * Also includes American indian and Pacific Islander

    Source Environmental Systems Research Institute, Market Profile; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Across the State, participation in the community college system varies among ethnic and racial groups. Statewide, however, young people of Hispanic heritage have been historically underrepresented in higher education.


    Implications for the College:


    1. The population in the effective service area is projected to grow with a 12.6% change between 2010 and 2021 or a 1.2% annual change rate between 2016 and 2021, but by 2026 the population is projected to become approximately 874,500. The largest census place within the District official service area, Gilroy, is projected to grow 24.9% between 2010 and 2021 or a 2.33% annual change rate between 2016 and 2021. The College should consider concentrating its outreach and recruiting in Gilroy, although Hollister is more in need of postsecondary education services.

    2. Data assembled for the adult education consortium activities indicate that within the official District service area there are a number of families living at or below the poverty level and a significant segment are English language learners. These data present important outreach implications and opportunities for the College.

    3. Throughout the effective service area, the portion of adult residents age 25 or older that have no high school diploma is 24%. In the largest census place within the District official service area, Gilroy, 21% of the adults have no high school diploma, but an even larger proportion, 26%, in Hollister have less than a high school education. There are ample residents who could benefit by attending the institution and completing a certificate or degree.

    4. Over the next five years the portion of teenagers and very young adults in the effective service area who are making career choices will continue to represent a substantial segment of the population. A limited number of public high schools have been the primary providers of students to the College. These data

      underscore the importance of outreach efforts the College might wish to continue in order to sustain enrollment volumes.

    5. In the official District service area 9% of the households reported an income that is below $15,000, another 8% reported income between $15,000 and $24,999. The large portion of low income households and households where English is spoken

      less than very well in the College’s official service area provide an opportunity

      for the College to be a “merchant of hope” by recruiting students whose lives will be transformed by their success at the institution.

    6. The portion of District residents who self-reported as Hispanic was 53% in 2016 but will only grow to 59% by 2021. In the largest city within the District official service area, Gilroy, the Hispanic group was 58.6% of the population in 2016 and will only grow to 59% by 2020. Traditionally, that group has had a lower participation rate in higher education. These trends present a particular recruiting challenge to the College.


    image

    Highway 101 in San Benito County

  6. Environmental Scan- Internal to the College

    The Institution from Within

    From fall 2000 to fall 2009, the unduplicated student headcount at Gavilan College underwent an increase of 5.9% annually, peaking in fall 2009 (9,411 students) with a total increase of 53% over fall 2000 (3,256 students). The annual unemployment rate in San Benito and Santa Clara Counties had climbed during that period and peaked in 2010 at 26%. From 2007-08 to 2010-11 budget cuts at the state level reduced community college funding by 4%.24


    From fall 2010 to fall 2014, the headcount decreased by 25% overall, a decrease of 4.1% annually. Unemployment in both counties declined sharply and enrollments across the state fell drastically during this same time period. In fall 2014 declining enrollments at Gavilan bottomed out at 6,298.


    Since fall 2014, unduplicated headcount has been gradually increasing, ending with an unduplicated headcount of 6,886 in fall 2015.


    Chart 6: Gavilan Fall Terms, Unduplicated Student Headcount and County Unemployment



    image

    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office, Data Mart. California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.


    image

    24 California Legislative Analyst’s Office. Higher Education Budget in Context. Retrieved January 28, 2017 from http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis/2011/highered

    This same trend in declining headcount after fall 2009 was also experienced in neighboring California community colleges. As of fall 2014, all except one of the colleges, Hartnell, had not regained student headcount. Foothill, Gavilan, and Mission were beginning to see modest increases in headcount after 2014.


    Chart 7: Gavilan and Neighboring Colleges Fall Term Unduplicated Student Headcount


    image


    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office, Data Mart; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.

    From 2009-10 to 2015-16 the annual Full-time Equivalent Students (FTES) produced at Gavilan decreased by 490 FTES, a decrease of 8.1%. All of the neighboring colleges, except Hartnell, experienced a more dramatic decrease.


    Chart 8: Gavilan and Neighboring Colleges Annual Credit FTES Trends


    image


    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office, Data Mart; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.


    Additional analysis of these trends is available in the GAVData, interactive Fact Book, produced by the College Office of Institutional Research or at the Office web page http://www.gavilan.edu/about/research/data.php under basic college facts.


    All colleges in the region have experienced some enrollment outflow of residents in their districts attending another college. The research staff at the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office has provided a swirl analysis for the fall terms of 2013 and 2014. Some students from out of the district area are enrolled in online courses offered by the College. A portion of that analysis is shown in the following table.

    Table 25: South San Francisco Bay Enrollment Outflow


    Fall 2013 & 2014 Fall 2013 & 2014

    District In District Nbr. In District % Out District Nbr.* Out District % Total

    CABRILLO

    23,072

    86%

    3,737

    14%

    26,809

    FOOTHILL-DEANZA

    26,940

    35%

    48,968

    65%

    75,908

    GAVILAN

    10,366

    81%

    2,483

    19%

    12,849

    HARTNELL

    15,125

    80%

    3,740

    20%

    18,865

    SAN JOSE-EVERGREEN

    31,879

    88%

    4,377

    12%

    36,256

    WEST VALLEY-MISSION

    25,549

    65%

    13,773

    35%

    39,322

    Region Total 132,931 63% 77,078 37% 210,009

    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office. Research, Analysis and Accountability Unit; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.


    The College has offered some unique programs of study that have been “magnets” to attract students The Joint Powers Agreement for public safety curriculum and apprenticeship curriculum offerings account for 74% of the out-of-district enrollments in fall 2015. The subjects that attracted the most out-of-district enrollments are documented in the following table.


    Table 26: Fall 2015, Gavilan Enrollments from Out-of-District California Regions


    Fall 2015 Out of District Enrollments by California Region


    Subject Total

    Central Coast

    Central Valley

    Northern

    Calif. SF Bay Sierras

    South SF Bay

    Southern Calif.

    CARP

    684

    2

    35


    32

    3

    611

    1

    JLE

    539

    11

    71

    55

    161

    21

    170

    50

    DRLT

    298


    35


    6


    255

    2

    ENGL

    165

    1

    37

    1

    5

    1

    119

    1

    JFT

    144

    3

    6

    10

    52

    8

    62

    3

    CSIS

    143

    2

    24

    4

    4

    5

    89

    15

    ATH

    139


    26


    6


    107


    MATH

    129


    22

    2

    2

    1

    101

    1

    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office. MIS Referential Files; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.


    Conversely, some programs of study offered by other community colleges or the location convenience of the other college to the student’s place of employment may be causing students living in the Gavilan College official district area to attend classes at another institution. The closest colleges to Gavilan, Evergreen Valley and San Jose City, are north via highway 101. The subjects offered by those two colleges that attracted the most Gavilan residents in fall 2013 are illustrated in the following table.

    Table 26: Fall 2013, Gavilan District Residents Enrolled at San Jose-Evergreen CCD


    Fall 2013 Gavilan Enrollment (Seat Counts) Counts in SJECCD


    Coyote


    Gilroy Hollister Morgan Hill


    Paicines

    San Juan Bautista

    San Martin


    San Jose

    Subj Total 95013 95020 95021 95023 95024 95037 95038 95043 95045 95046 95138 95139

    ENGL

    338

    1

    53

    1

    23

    2

    112


    1

    1

    12

    106

    26

    MATH

    266

    1

    45


    21


    79



    1

    13

    83

    23

    HIST

    132


    21

    1

    7


    42


    2

    2

    8

    35

    14

    PSYCH

    123

    1

    15


    8


    39



    1

    4

    36

    19

    COMS

    105

    1

    17


    3

    1

    36

    1


    1

    2

    34

    9

    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office. MIS Referential Files; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.


    The College operates two satellite centers to accommodate residents who live in Hollister and Morgan Hill and may not find it convenient to travel to the main campus located in Gilroy. However, in the baseline term for this Plan, fall 2015, 1,866 individuals living in Hollister enrolled at the College. Of those, 1,233 (66%) did make the journey to the main campus. The following table reflects the enrollments in the most popular subjects in which they enrolled.


    Table 27: Fall 2015, Hollister Residents Enrollments in Classes at the Main Campus


    Division Description Department Description Subject Nbr Enrls % of Total Enrl.

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Natural Sciences & Math

    MATH

    390

    12.4%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    English

    ENGL

    324

    10.3%

    Kinesiology

    Kinesiology

    KIN

    240

    7.6%

    Counseling and Guidance

    Counseling

    GUID

    140

    4.4%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Natural Sciences & Math

    BIO

    135

    4.3%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Fine Arts

    CMUN

    132

    4.2%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Fine Arts

    ART

    113

    3.6%

    Disability Resource Center

    Disability Resource Center

    DRCGUID

    97

    3.1%

    Subtotal of Above Enrollments 1,571

    Total Enrollments 3,151

    Source: Gavilan College, Office of Institutional Research; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC

    In the baseline term for this Plan, fall 2015, 979 individuals living in Morgan Hill enrolled at the College. Of those, 714 (73%) did make the journey to the main campus. The following table reflects the enrollments in the most popular subjects in which they enrolled.


    Table 28: Fall 2015, Morgan Hill Residents Enrollments in Classes at the Main Campus


    Division Description Department Description Subject Nbr Enrls. % of Total Enrl.

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Natural Sciences & Math

    MATH

    197

    10.8%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    English

    ENGL

    177

    9.7%

    Kinesiology

    Kinesiology

    KIN

    110

    6.0%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Fine Arts

    CMUN

    97

    5.3%

    Counseling and Guidance

    Counseling

    GUID

    89

    4.9%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Fine Arts

    ART

    87

    4.8%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Social Sciences

    HIST

    78

    4.3%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Social Sciences

    PSYC

    71

    3.9%

    Career Technical Education

    Business

    CSIS

    65

    3.6%

    Disability Resource Center

    Disability Resource Center

    DRCGUID

    61

    3.3%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Natural Sciences & Math

    BIO

    58

    3.2%

    Disability Resource Center

    Disability Resource Center

    AE

    55

    3.0%

    Liberal Arts and Sciences

    Social Sciences

    SOC

    55

    3.0%

    Subtotal of Above Enrollments 1,200

    Total Enrollments 1,822

    Source: Gavilan College, Office of Institutional Research; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    image

    Gavilan College Athletics Program Mascot

    In recent years the College has increased its outreach efforts with the local high schools. From fall 2011 to fall 2015 the fall term and average yield rates are shown in the following table. The yield is calculated from the count of graduates (denominator) divided into the count of students who enroll at the College the following fall (numerator).


    Table 29: High School Yield Rates


    Gilroy USD

    Average


    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2015


    Gilroy High

    25%

    20%

    27%

    45%

    41%

    32%

    Christopher High


    24%

    39%

    4%

    13%

    20%

    Mt. Madonna High (Continuation)

    15%

    9%

    17%

    18%

    18%

    15%

    Dr. TJ Owens Gilroy Early College Academy

    29%

    9%

    3%

    25%

    17%

    16%

    Morgan Hill USD



    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2015


    Live Oak High

    15%

    16%

    17%

    18%

    30%

    19%

    Ann Sobrato High

    8%

    13%

    11%

    14%

    23%

    14%

    Central High (Continuation)

    7%

    12%

    4%

    0%

    8%

    6%

    San Benito HSD & Aromas-San Juan USD



    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2015


    San Benito High

    25%

    19%

    26%

    30%

    23%

    25%

    San Andreas High (Continuation)

    22%

    7%

    9%

    13%

    11%

    12%

    Anzar High

    11%

    10%

    26%

    31%

    18%

    19%

    Source: California Department of Education. California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office. MIS Referential Files; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.

    The community colleges are the main point of access to higher education in the state of California. Collectively they have been serving approximately 75% of the public undergraduate college enrollment in the state. The Great Recession had a significant impact on the ability of the system to serve those who needed access to the academic and vocational program offerings. Between 2009-10 and 2014-15, the system-wide participation rate dropped from 84.3 to 73.3 per 1,000 adults. Gavilan College has had a similar experience with respect to the participation rate from cities and census-designated places within the district service area. However, the College has come back with strong participation from the larger communities in the official service area.


    Table 30: Participation Per 1,000 Adults


    Participation Per 1,000 Adults City County 2000 2010 2015

    Gilroy

    Santa Clara

    93.37

    113.75

    144.57

    Hollister

    San Benito

    107.20

    134.37

    168.09

    Morgan Hill

    Santa Clara

    59.93

    72.18

    71.84

    San Jose (2 zips)

    Santa Clara


    4.17

    4.66

    San Juan Bautista

    San Benito

    151.30

    145.35

    163.82

    San Martin

    Santa Clara

    85.70

    63.08

    75.84


    Total

    88.97

    88.01

    106.00

    System-wide


    103.38

    84.30

    73.30

    Source: U.S. Census American Fact Finder. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office. MIS Referential Files; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.


    From fall 2009 to fall 2015 the College has had to reduce the numbers of classes scheduled at the Hollister and Morgan Hill satellite locations as well as off-campus in general. Noncredit FTES has been the strongest in off-campus locations, but those offerings were curtailed based upon policy direction from the Chancellor’s Office. In the following table the count of sections does not considered combined classes where multiple sections are taught on the same day pattern in the same room at the same time. Those sections were counted individually

    Table 31: Schedule and FTES Trends by Location Fall 2009-2015



    Fall 2009

    Fall 2011

    Fall 2013

    Fall 2015

    Average

    2009 vs 2015 % Change

    Location

    # Sect. Enrl

    # Sect. Enrl

    # Sect. Enrl

    # Sect. Enrl

    # Sect. Enrl

    # Sect. Enrl

    Aviation

    4

    41











    Gilroy

    551

    12,984

    567

    13,986

    553

    10,754

    571

    12,286

    560.50

    12,502.50

    4%

    -5%

    Hollister

    53

    962

    59

    1,170

    63

    1,119

    40

    980

    53.75

    1,057.75

    -25%

    2%

    Morgan Hill

    53

    1,098

    64

    1,133

    59

    1,001

    40

    960

    54.00

    1,048.00

    -25%

    -13%

    Off Campus

    224

    6,387

    151

    5,341

    163

    6,373

    206

    8,257

    186.00

    6,589.50

    -8%

    29%

    San Benito





    2

    17







    Total

    885 21,472

    841

    21,630

    840

    19,264

    857

    22,483

    855.75

    21,212.25

    -3%

    5%


    Full-time Equivalent Students

    Average

    2009 vs 2015 % Change

    Location Credit Non Cr.

    Credit Non Cr.

    Credit Non Cr.

    Credit Non Cr.

    Credit Non Cr.

    Credit Non Cr.

    Aviation

    20.17












    Gilroy

    1,701.20

    113.85

    1,655.33

    100.58

    1,598.15

    78.45

    1,581.25

    38.16

    1,633.98

    82.76

    -7%

    -66%

    Hollister

    125.56

    4.15

    143.94

    7.10

    121.82

    11.17

    98.06

    9.57

    122.35

    8.00

    -22%

    131%

    Morgan Hill

    134.72

    6.85

    133.65

    7.87

    115.39

    6.59

    102.37

    8.97

    121.53

    7.57

    -24%

    31%

    Off Campus

    287.07

    187.38

    352.06

    143.51

    208.89

    147.73

    342.13

    144.60

    297.54

    155.81

    19%

    -23%

    San Benito





    2.28








    Total 2,268.72 312.23

    2,284.98

    259.06

    2,046.53

    243.94

    2,123.81

    201.30

    2,181.01

    254.13

    -6%

    -36%

    Source: Gavilan College Office of Institutional Research; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Current Program of Instruction

    The fall 2015 program of instruction was used as a baseline to define the needs for instructional and student support space. The detailed analysis of the projected program of instruction is located in the Projections for Future Growth chapter of this plan. The available instructional space determines the institution’s capacity to produce weekly student contact hours (WSCH).


    At the start of the 2016-17 academic year, the College was authorized to offer 138 credit instructional programs (degrees and certificates). Twenty-one of these approved programs are new transfer model curriculum degrees. Ten of these new transfer degrees are in fields of study previously approved as associate degrees. There are 20 degrees offered in disciplines that are considered within the liberal arts areas but are not duplicative of the associate degrees for transfer. The College has established 14 certificates of achievement in traditional liberal arts fields of study.


    The remaining degrees and certificates are in disciplines that are considered career and technical education. Of these programs, 34 culminate in the award of an associate degree while 40 culminate in the award of a certificate of achievement.


    Overall forty of the associate degrees offer certificates of achievement in the same field of study; the students may choose to earn both. Thirteen of the programs of study offer two different associate degrees in the same field of concentration.


    The College offers several programs that are accredited by county, state or federal agencies, while others are accredited by national professional associations. The Federal Aviation Administration accredits the Aviation Technology programs. The California Board of Registered Nursing accredits the Associate Degree Nursing program and the California Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians accredits the Licensed Vocational Nursing program. Through a Joint Powers Agreement and the South Bay Regional Public Safety Training Consortium, the


    Additionally, the Board of Trustees has authorized the College to award 15 Certificates of Proficiency that require less than 18 units of credit. By state policy those certificates are not entered on the students’ transcripts upon completion. Also, the Chancellor’s Office has authorized three non-credit certificate programs.


    In fall 2015 the College submitted a substantive change proposal to the regional accrediting agency, Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC). In February 2016 the Commission approved 41 associate degrees and 38 certificate programs to be offered where fifty percent or more of the curriculum was delivered via distance education or electronic delivery.


    When compared to colleges producing a comparable volume of FTES, Gavilan appears to be offering a broader range of programs of study than all but one of its peers. Among the four peer institutions only Cuyamaca College offers slightly more degrees and certificates. The count of Taxonomy of Programs (TOPs) data is an expression of the number of different disciplines provided in the degree and certificate programs of study. Including non-credit offerings, the efforts by Gavilan cover a wider range of disciplines than any of its peer institutions. Supporting this variety of instructional programs and disciplines may be difficult. The counts of degrees shown in the following table have been adjusted to remove duplicates when an associate degree for transfer has been implemented.


    Table 32: Comparative Breadth of Curriculum Programs of Study


    Fall 2015

    Programs of Study

    Nbr Distinct

    College Name Total FTES Total Cert Degree NonCredit TOPs

    Napa Valley

    2,703.72

    82

    24

    58

    4

    44

    Yuba

    2,622.95

    109

    43

    66


    56

    San Jose City

    2,618.60

    112

    57

    55


    41

    Gavilan

    2,590.84

    138

    54

    84

    3

    64

    Cuyamaca

    2,476.40

    146

    55

    91


    58

    Sources: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. Data Mart and Curriculum Inventory.

    Retrieved December 24, 2016 from http://datamart.cccco.edu and http://curriculum.cccco.edu


    At the beginning of the 2016-17 academic year Gavilan College had established 22 Associate Degrees for Transfer (AD-T). The College is in the top group of community colleges in the numbers of these AD-T programs it has implemented. The College has submitted a program in Biology and a second in Elementary Teacher Education. The

    College’s standing in the state as of the spring 2017 term is documented in the following table.


    image

    image

    image

    Table 33: State Summary of Associate Degrees for Transfer, December 2016


    Quartile

    Category

    Nbr. Colleges

    4th

    22 to 28 degrees (Gavilan)

    28

    3rd

    19 to 21 degrees

    26

    2nd

    15 to 18 degrees

    27

    1st

    5 to 14 degrees

    32


    image

    Total

    113

    image

    image

    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor’s Office, Academic Affairs Division, Transfer Model Curriculum AD-T Progress Report, September 28, 2016 and Curriculum Inventory; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Of the 932 possible courses listed in the College curriculum inventory, 181 have been named in these 21 transfer degree programs. The courses required or named as restricted electives in these transfer degree programs must be offered at least once in a two-year cycle. There are scheduling implications associated with the institutional commitment to sponsor so many AD-T degrees. Most courses were identified in only one transfer degree program; however, a limited number of courses were identified in more than two AD-Ts as illustrated in the following table.


    Table 34: High Frequency Named Courses in Associate Degrees for Transfer



    Course Description

    Total Programs

    MATH5*

    Introduction to Statistics

    7

    SOC1A*

    Introduction to Sociology

    4

    MATH1A

    Single Variable Calculus & Analytic Geometry

    4

    MATH1B

    Single Variable Calculus & Analytic Geometry

    4

    ANTH3*

    Introduction to Cultural Anthropology

    4

    ART1A*

    Art History

    3

    ART1B*

    Art History

    3

    ART8A

    Introduction to Photography

    3

    ENGL1C*

    Critical Reasoning and Writing

    3

    MATH1C

    Multivariable Calculus

    3

    PHYC10

    Introduction to Psychology

    3

    *course is offered both online and face-to-face on campus

    Source: Gavilan College. 2015-17 Catalog; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    The fall 2015 program of instruction on the main campus in Gilroy consisted of 505 sections (considering a set of combined classes as one class), which generated 1,677 credit full-time equivalent students (FTES). Off campus classes accounted for 206 sections and 342 FTES. The satellite location at Hollister hosted 39 sections with 84

    FTES generated. The Morgan Hill satellite location offered 38 sections and generated 92 FTES. Miscellaneous off site/off campus locations accounted for 158 sections and generated 428 FTES.


    The divisions of the College determined percentage shares of the WSCH attendance at the main campus in Gilroy. Two divisions account for the largest portions of WSCH in the fall 2015 program of instruction: (1) Liberal Arts and Science (56%) and (2) Career & Technical (26%). The key characteristics of the fall 2015 program of instruction are reflected in the following table. Combined class sections were considered in this analysis. Apprentice instruction does not generate WSCH or apportionment, but the sections were included.


    Table 35: Fall 2015 Key Measures for the Program of Instruction


    Main Campus in Gilroy Division WSCH % Sects. %

    Counseling

    535

    1%

    25

    5%

    Career & Technical

    12,475

    24%

    118

    23%

    Disability Resource Center

    2,078

    4%

    34

    7%

    Kinesiology & Athletics

    4,148

    8%

    34

    7%

    Liberal Arts & Sciences

    32,289

    62%

    279

    55%

    Non-Credit

    576

    1%

    15

    3%

    Totals 52,101 505

    Source: Gavilan College, Office of Institutional Research, analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    During the fall 2015 baseline term the College offered 416 different courses. Among the 416 courses, 31 of them accounted for fifty percent of all. Those 31 courses represent 17 different subjects, but the two subjects with the largest enrollments were Math (6 courses) and English (4 courses). The fall schedule reflected 54 different subjects, six of which captured fifty percent of all enrollments. These large enrollment subjects were LIB, ENGL, MATH, GUID, KIN, and CARP.


    Scheduling classes at a large, complex institution such as Gavilan College is a significant juggling act to balance facilities, faculty, weeks-duration, days, and time slots. It is particularly challenging to orchestrate coordinated time periods for classes with different numbers of contact hours and classes that run for different numbers of weeks. Also, some classes are offered to address the needs of cohorts of learners in special programs and others are offered off site and not on the main campus. Many of the conflicts identified in the following discussion flow from conflicts among these variables.


    An analysis of the instructional periods used in the fall 2015 schedule was limited to the classes scheduled in a fixed pattern on the main campus in Gilroy. There were six primary instructional periods related to the common two-day-a-week day scheduling pattern (starting before 4:30 pm). However, 27% of classes were scheduled at starting and ending times that conflicted with these primary instructional periods.

    Twelve classes were scheduled to meet two days a week, but the day patterns differed from the more common Monday and Wednesday or Tuesday and Thursday pattern. In addition, all of those classes had starting times that varied from the six primary instructional periods.


    An additional 91 sections were scheduled on three or more days per week, but 56% of those classes were also scheduled at starting times that conflicted with the six primary instructional periods.


    Some of this potential conflict may have arisen from the differences in contact time required by courses with different units of credit and different combinations of lecture and laboratory modes of instruction.


    The following tables illustrate the fall 2015 term patterns and potential conflicts on the main campus at Gilroy.


    image

    Ribbon Cutting for the New Aviation Maintenance Program Facility in San Martin

    Table 36: Gilroy Main Campus Day Schedule Pattern Analysis, Fall 2015


    Day Classes, Scheduled Two Days Per Week


    Period

    Period Times

    Monday and Wednesday

    Tuesday and

    Thursday Subtotal


    1


    2


    3


    4


    5


    6

    starts <8:10 am, ends odd

    3

    1

    4

    8:10-9:30 am

    13

    17

    30

    starts between 8:10-9:30 am, ends odd

    5

    10

    15

    9:45-11:05 am

    26

    27

    53

    starts between 9:16-11:19 am

    0

    1

    1

    11:20 am-12:40 pm

    25

    25

    50

    starts at 11:10-12:50 am, ends odd

    10

    8

    18

    12:50-2:10 pm

    23

    11

    34

    starts between 12:50-2:29 pm

    0

    14

    14

    2:30-3:50 pm

    13

    5

    18

    starts between 2:30-3:30 pm, ends odd

    11

    7

    18

    4:00-5:20 pm

    5

    4

    9

    starts between 4:00-4:29 pm

    0

    3

    3



    Period

    Totals

    134

    133

    267

    Percent in the primary periods

    78.4%

    66.9%

    72.7%

    Percent out of the primary periods

    21.6%

    33.1%

    27.3%

    Day Classes, Scheduled Multiple Days Per Week


    MF


    MT


    WTh


    FSa


    MTTh


    MTThF


    MTW


    MTWTh


    MWTh


    MTWThF


    MWF


    TWTh


    TWThF


    WThF


    Subtotal



    3

    1





    1


    4




    1

    10

    1


    2


    3


    4


    5


    6





    1



    2


    2

    1


    1


    7


    3






    2



    4


    12


    21








    4



    3


    3


    10

    1


    1

    1




    3



    1

    1



    8








    4



    3




    7











    1

    1



    2






    1


    2



    6




    9


    1

    1




    1

    2







    5










    1



    1


    2






    1






    1



    2








    3


    2





    5











    1

    2




    3


    1

    7

    3

    1

    1

    2

    1

    23

    0

    10

    21

    3

    17

    1

    91

    Percent in the primary periods 44.0%

    Percent out of the primary periods 56.0% Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor Office, Data on Demand Fall 2015 MIS Referential File XF, Sessions; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Classes scheduled to meet only one day a week during the prime instructional morning hours create potential conflicts in room utilization and student schedules. In fall 2015 there were 49 classes scheduled in that manner as summarized in the following table. Classes scheduled to meet one day a week in the afternoon are less problematic.

    Table 37: Gilroy Main Campus Morning One Day A Week Morning Classes, Fall 2015


    One-Day-A-Week Starting in the Prime AM Hours (up to noon)

    Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Subtotal Friday Saturday Total

    image

    9 12 16 12 49 35 2 86

    18% 24% 33% 24% 100%

    Source: California Community Colleges, Chancellor Office, Data on Demand Fall 2015 MIS Referential File XF, Sessions; analysis by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC


    Evening classes, those starting at 4:30 pm or later, which were scheduled to meet two- days-a-week, showed less variety of starting and ending times as well as day patterns. Sixty-nine percent were offered during the primary two evening periods meeting two days per week. However, another seven classes were scheduled to meet multiple days a week in the evenings and 86% of those were starting at times other than the two primary evening instructional periods. Most evening classes met one evening per week and all of them conformed to the established two evening instructional period starting times.


    Table 38: Gilroy Main Campus Evening Schedule Patterns Analysis, Fall 2015


    Evening Classes, Scheduled Two Days Per Week


    Period # Start Times

    Monday and Wednesday

    Tuesday and

    Thursday Total


    7

    8

    starts between 4:30-5:59 pm, ends odd


    5

    5

    6:00 PM

    5

    6

    11

    6:30 PM



    0



    Total

    5

    11

    16

    Percent in the primary periods

    100.0%

    54.5%

    68.8%

    Percent out of the primary periods

    0.0%

    45.5%

    31.3%

    Classes Scheduled One-Day-A-Week in the Evening (start after 4:29pm)


    6:00 PM

    14

    11

    13

    11

    49